{"id":"W2943062665","doi":"10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.053","title":"Improving environmental risk assessments of chemicals: Steps towards evidence-based ecotoxicology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environment International","topic":"Chemistry and Chemical Engineering","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Manitoba; McMaster University; Queen's University","funders":"Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry","keywords":"Ecotoxicology; Variety (cybernetics); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Environmental risk assessment; Environmental planning; Business; Environmental resource management; Environmental science; Computer science; Toxicology; Biology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000203412,0.0001861312,0.0001749898,0.00002379582,0.00002719803,0.00001208904,0.0004485131,0.0001122067,0.03604895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004343537,0.0001899843,0.0001164647,0.0000362817,0.0001348935,0.0002346203,0.0003432718,0.0002214939,0.0006723918],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005745374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008933845,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003169134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.855196e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984161,0.00002534677,0.0003308527,0.0004201745,0.0005745412,0.0002330372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992793,0.0001113139,0.0002130421,0.0002978877,0.000001464386,0.0000969894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003976315,0.0002005807,0.1078732,0.00001290053,0.00003128117,0.000001959233,0.00001749599,0.01354294,0.8708564,0.000005256246,0.00008830144,0.007329843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008452235,0.0001090277,0.05858549,0.00004321568,0.00003125848,0.000004628675,0.0000367806,0.0445879,0.8872017,0.00005603989,0.008177984,0.0003206974],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928956,0.00004426887,0.002019233,0.00009051859,0.0001878367,0.0001717909,0.00006477492,0.00002271291,0.00450329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957145,0.00007734784,0.003100852,0.00008749538,0.00005254292,0.00002803774,0.00005930242,0.00001830118,0.0008616352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04928775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9648322,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008905361931406659,"score_gpt":0.2287636666384373,"score_spread":0.2198583047070307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}