{"id":"W2943278242","doi":"10.22215/etd/2006-07792","title":"Evaluating the relationship between floristic quality and measures of plant biodiversity in riparian habitats","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Heritage; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Riparian zone; Floristics; Geography; Forestry; Biodiversity; Habitat; Ecology; Biology; Species richness","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001897848,0.0001965035,0.0001718514,0.0009912584,0.0002390349,0.0008551669,0.0002303674,0.000367931,0.001611537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006788704,0.0001565663,0.0002802826,0.00087865,0.0003129551,0.0006127593,0.0004428105,0.0004472249,0.0002881245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003528321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002729971,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004198389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01225891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994575,0.0002249227,0.0000392934,0.000095081,0.0001205783,0.00006262573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933178,0.00386712,0.001480589,0.0002203906,0.0004249149,0.0006891586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001376698,0.0000701485,0.9943469,0.00001020775,0.0001188289,0.00001359445,0.00007520626,0.0001691389,0.0005425626,0.00002643112,0.00003970006,0.004449628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001831286,0.0001478467,0.9989774,0.000002666427,0.00002122354,0.00002686411,0.0001282987,0.0004082524,0.0001675544,0.00005027697,0.00006493176,0.000002911127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990138,0.0001178984,0.0002380514,0.00001677013,0.0000017842,0.000006833069,0.0001182576,0.000002150311,0.0004844723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983599,0.00009655692,0.0006607026,0.00001372308,0.000003317323,0.000007709088,0.0003663991,0.000003391515,0.0004883128],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004198389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01003689,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1746653181198901,"score_gpt":0.3649044872741718,"score_spread":0.1902391691542817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}