{"id":"W2943340242","doi":"10.1109/icm.2018.8704066","title":"An Effective FPGA Placement Flow Selection Framework using Machine Learning","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Field-programmable gate array; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Selection (genetic algorithm); Flow (mathematics); CONTEST; Placement; CAD; Design flow; Parallel computing; Computer engineering; Computer architecture; Embedded system; Machine learning; Circuit design; Physical design; Engineering drawing; Mathematics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001395597,0.001073607,0.001197728,0.001538335,0.0005542142,0.001120019,0.001832213,0.00146346,0.002299097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002916083,0.0004613459,0.0006868604,0.0009183502,0.0005422684,0.001003178,0.0007495965,0.001231371,0.0008604656],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001097061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001725429,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005405713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006207949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990055,0.0002599056,0.00005042023,0.000217808,0.0003717774,0.00009460548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988753,0.0004757613,0.0001333856,0.00009694253,0.0003673747,0.00005130189],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008266232,0.0001464337,0.0009478095,0.00006297272,0.00003344692,0.00007522759,0.00002881947,0.6821963,0.004220113,0.003095699,0.002614205,0.3064963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004885096,0.00002391929,0.00006142967,0.000003434139,0.000002872413,0.00001247087,0.0000032762,0.9980125,0.0007988223,0.0007659068,0.0003079746,0.000002440188],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.006178591,0.0001528489,0.9913872,0.0001259377,0.00001628688,0.00004605166,0.00004244566,0.001452476,0.0005981517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2974978,0.0001765617,0.6990159,0.0002456957,0.0001011309,0.0002018705,0.0003969276,0.0001768141,0.002187362],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005405713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01074851,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008083971132520039,"score_gpt":0.2535929714244738,"score_spread":0.2455090002919538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}