{"id":"W2943413782","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.12265","title":"Public attention to extreme weather as reflected by social media activity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","topic":"Public Relations and Crisis Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Tornado; Social media; Extreme weather; Interpretation (philosophy); Storm; Microblogging; Risk communication; Event (particle physics); Information sharing; Public relations; Crisis communication; Political science; Climate change; Computer science; Business; Meteorology; Geography; Risk analysis (engineering)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008797026,0.0001426545,0.0001595596,0.001482989,0.0005468871,0.001571921,0.000194091,0.0004861382,0.003497442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008723441,0.0001043048,0.0001094506,0.0009284366,0.0004119323,0.0009136913,0.001166525,0.0005742353,0.0003529556],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004021642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002146371,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001777764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002437572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992328,0.0003613516,0.00004652774,0.00008151074,0.0001695871,0.0001082127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877685,0.006299311,0.00404269,0.0002926608,0.0009639572,0.0006330489],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006451528,0.0003245059,0.8993906,0.0002292573,0.0001185363,0.0003799025,0.04372047,0.000382927,0.007265691,0.001018862,0.001940042,0.04458411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008102733,0.0002200342,0.9519112,0.00006723833,0.00003823963,0.0001428486,0.04119742,0.001081314,0.0009977098,0.0005149416,0.003794542,0.00002638752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942478,0.00005698979,0.0001484346,0.0002397297,0.00001426779,0.00001326622,0.0001395359,0.000007307295,0.005132611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993807,0.00005624803,0.0000794672,0.00002773256,0.00002438671,0.00001305413,0.00005946633,0.000002189457,0.0003566979],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003497442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01170015,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05456099328872924,"score_gpt":0.3061003912450748,"score_spread":0.2515393979563455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}