{"id":"W2943585670","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12135","title":"Cross‐lagged panel analysis of reciprocal effects of morphological processing and reading in Chinese in a multilingual context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Research in Reading","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Reading (process); Reading comprehension; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Context (archaeology); Path analysis (statistics); Linguistics; Reciprocal; Comprehension; Panel analysis; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Panel data; Social psychology; Communication; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001513014,0.0003756378,0.0002688138,0.0004598489,0.0004618264,0.0005932836,0.0003303577,0.0003004313,0.0046187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003908358,0.0002543913,0.0005325249,0.0005175422,0.000282905,0.0004106937,0.0006397421,0.0007073673,0.0003300706],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004755779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007148784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01717013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02440252,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99929,0.0003203728,0.00002982854,0.000204241,0.00006680483,0.00008870255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950589,0.002994729,0.0006963979,0.0005222647,0.0003416949,0.0003859553],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009793908,0.0004076701,0.9683173,0.00005162285,0.0004554473,0.0004322268,0.0025816,0.001565332,0.01288828,0.0008025051,0.0003472079,0.01117139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001111284,0.0002584365,0.9941055,0.000007229783,0.0001053203,0.00004355396,0.0005671887,0.002645007,0.001767529,0.0001811265,0.0002963678,0.00001153498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990761,0.00002848412,0.0004285987,0.00001067524,0.000003080812,0.000006609098,0.0001517135,0.000007636982,0.0002870102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989711,0.00002012195,0.0004146222,0.000007084558,0.000001796725,0.00002027528,0.0002649557,0.000003991823,0.0002961044],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01717013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03414041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09112353795567756,"score_gpt":0.4799053211176721,"score_spread":0.3887817831619946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}