{"id":"W2943983580","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.336","title":"Strength of methods assessment for aquatic primary producer toxicity data: A critical review of atrazine studies from the peer-reviewed literature","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Science of The Total Environment","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Periphyton; Macrophyte; Environmental science; Risk assessment; Population; Atrazine; Replicate; Biology; Ecology; Statistics; Environmental health; Algae; Computer science; Mathematics; Pesticide; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06073783,0.00163138,0.005661341,0.01140704,0.0006581399,0.004582367,0.005645162,0.002630553,0.002785086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1042235,0.001234148,0.004591097,0.007878514,0.002037151,0.004474336,0.00291384,0.002591257,0.0008125037],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003390787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004266676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01063298,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9612758,0.01142314,0.01119486,0.002357905,0.01336291,0.0003853667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8445255,0.1065869,0.01812305,0.002762386,0.02728103,0.0007212123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003497951,0.00006000147,0.001856281,0.3236083,0.00433742,0.0002180929,0.0005145749,0.0003597758,0.001907767,0.002060699,0.009391181,0.6553361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001781536,0.0005960966,0.01251405,0.3724339,0.01853736,0.001542856,0.0008606514,0.0006310014,0.004166713,0.004047721,0.5842487,0.0002427824],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004017928,0.9968517,0.0008501458,0.0008199725,0.000302659,0.00008632019,0.0001921452,0.000007055027,0.0004881425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004462913,0.9900188,0.003980319,0.0007575401,0.0002505645,0.0001192869,0.0002021804,0.00001262974,0.0001956015],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06073783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3212162,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1276683762689458,"score_gpt":0.435301259209749,"score_spread":0.3076328829408032,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}