{"id":"W2944313297","doi":"10.15353/cjo.71.663","title":"A comparative study of the efficiency of chart versus computer-generated contrast sensitivity testing in glaucoma patients and controls","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of optometry/CJO. Canadian journal of optometry","topic":"Glaucoma and retinal disorders","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contrast (vision); Glaucoma; Medicine; Chart; Sensitivity (control systems); Ophthalmology; Optometry; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001407971,0.0003869937,0.001657998,0.003528432,0.0002253316,0.00007381538,0.0004169777,0.0001836744,0.0000324859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009496332,0.0002980676,0.0002831407,0.003308023,0.0004396108,0.0002491063,0.00001864867,0.001035866,8.053929e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005246887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003123461,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004308471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004860634,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996044,0.0004716649,0.00174292,0.0002409186,0.0007569144,0.0007435628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932092,0.0005314014,0.001778512,0.0002540168,0.002313772,0.001913076],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005005753,0.0004158473,0.9938086,0.00004851542,0.0003254844,0.0007005353,0.001731522,0.0001196151,0.001292572,0.000001660656,0.0002443419,0.0008106733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01209129,0.005074434,0.9764017,0.0007763578,0.0003006469,0.0008611509,0.002886785,0.0007385372,0.0006075927,8.503208e-7,0.00002315017,0.0002374618],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965512,0.001026513,0.00006762706,0.000584352,0.0008319365,0.0006232116,0.00007221443,0.000002277785,0.0002407182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992267,0.00001175133,0.0003991143,0.0001832384,0.0001438815,6.362509e-7,0.000003067823,0.0000237974,0.000007852672],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01740692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999471,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01761537759396316,"score_gpt":0.2920418139034221,"score_spread":0.274426436309459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}