{"id":"W2944318639","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.006","title":"A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Duke University","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Counterfactual conditional; Causation; Action (physics); Psychology; Overdetermination; Causal model; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Causal analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002040687,0.00006135148,0.00005728784,0.00004588902,0.00006463912,0.00001687541,0.00005844816,0.00003734524,0.0001050773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007466326,0.000043042,0.00002761578,0.00006276344,0.00002321477,0.0001240748,0.000009167535,0.00007149545,0.0002904864],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004557412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006761481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002499423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001170949,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994261,0.00005507474,0.00009175631,0.0001774373,0.0001351292,0.0001144718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994634,0.0004045292,0.00003900621,0.00006350496,0.00001518866,0.0000143613],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001416733,0.0002748964,0.001949568,0.00007823218,0.00001283758,0.000004115459,0.0003207465,0.000362247,0.9392376,0.001065329,0.006180509,0.04909722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004900533,0.001263512,0.0790936,0.0001067077,0.00004049244,0.00002780311,0.0001844914,0.008329466,0.8941488,0.005693184,0.005955225,0.0002561737],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946449,0.00001122427,0.001179017,0.001454285,0.0009161664,0.0007059047,0.00001813188,0.00002338622,0.001046942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982559,0.00001817954,0.000007812369,0.001276191,0.0000724573,0.0001452862,0.00002656784,0.00000469073,0.0001929197],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07714403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3733712,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.138445439679472,"score_gpt":0.3275055447263308,"score_spread":0.1890601050468588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}