{"id":"W2944318639","doi":"10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.006","title":"A counterfactual explanation for the action effect in causal judgment","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cognition","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Global Affairs Canada","funders":"Office of Naval Research; Duke University","keywords":"Counterfactual thinking; Counterfactual conditional; Causation; Action (physics); Psychology; Overdetermination; Causal model; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Causal analysis; Econometrics; Economics; Epistemology; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005243951,0.0004985703,0.0005519586,0.00130464,0.0007340442,0.003238067,0.001770408,0.003483466,0.02072079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03356335,0.000652969,0.001120255,0.0006646022,0.003710837,0.00791724,0.001890959,0.002793975,0.001041927],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007519023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008433255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001098242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064566,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978028,0.0007826471,0.0001278282,0.0005203201,0.0006079696,0.0001584211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844407,0.01104836,0.0009432787,0.002021408,0.001131777,0.0004145353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000284003,0.0001434429,0.001570148,0.0002550652,0.00007582741,0.0003314909,0.0008878405,0.001328757,0.009030256,0.9643993,0.002032691,0.01966109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001022417,0.00005490201,0.003437845,0.0000381813,0.00004699486,0.0004460657,0.0001381435,0.01076684,0.001629312,0.9807507,0.00255967,0.0000290603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2296641,0.002385527,0.5449352,0.03033747,0.002627503,0.0002189459,0.0006170864,0.0009016627,0.1883126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9481051,0.0004652987,0.04532365,0.00140417,0.0005622323,0.0001181079,0.0002047541,0.0001499248,0.003666932],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02072079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06931794,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.138445439679472,"score_gpt":0.3275055447263308,"score_spread":0.1890601050468588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}