{"id":"W2944511057","doi":"10.3386/w25856","title":"A Study of Exclusionary Coalitions: The Canadian Sugar Coalition, 1888–1889","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"National Bureau of Economic Research","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sugar; Political science; Chemistry; Food science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00268242,0.0003170668,0.0004003253,0.004418238,0.028511,0.005075756,0.001707057,0.001622565,0.004585372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006351167,0.0003451163,0.0002726595,0.00739357,0.017685,0.002484594,0.003524524,0.002906004,0.0002608752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1094842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09791625,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9896103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967676,0.0002341114,0.00004526941,0.0002330646,0.001245302,0.001474623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967909,0.0006381058,0.0004333534,0.0001732947,0.001219197,0.0007451609],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006578707,0.00005995033,0.03774855,0.00006884793,0.00002932001,0.0009017381,0.1644025,0.001040665,0.0002890466,0.7382504,0.01975953,0.03738372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002959553,0.00003568847,0.1531382,0.0002636136,0.00004151306,0.0003125698,0.1333524,0.001112786,0.0005654664,0.02763651,0.6834081,0.0001035866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5722116,0.003657292,0.002072425,0.01088674,0.0001064939,0.00011576,0.0006542156,0.00001765923,0.4102778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643132,0.001813387,0.0006916068,0.000979473,0.00004061704,0.00004204119,0.0003032993,0.00001569365,0.03180067],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1094842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7943668,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.32556093690841,"score_gpt":0.4823855208030201,"score_spread":0.1568245838946101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}