{"id":"W2944568192","doi":"10.1108/ijlls-10-2018-0072","title":"Developing theoretical coherence in teaching and learning: case of neuroscience-framed learning study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies","topic":"Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Fieldnotes; Originality; Praxis; Psychology; Mathematics education; Thematic analysis; Value (mathematics); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Experiential learning; Cognition; Pedagogy; Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Epistemology; Neuroscience; Creativity; Social psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01616113,0.0007104218,0.001037875,0.002661152,0.02492423,0.009826366,0.00385221,0.004086127,0.003366339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03108941,0.0008037129,0.000520215,0.002812411,0.03520545,0.004859832,0.01239007,0.005711543,0.0005250738],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03611011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02512353,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1927568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3208238,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9789732,0.01485157,0.0003484735,0.001715165,0.001863712,0.002247856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692379,0.022339,0.001215881,0.002152799,0.002470577,0.002583943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003170724,0.00008372607,0.001848077,0.0000608116,0.000003737065,0.002614028,0.9784848,0.0002138508,0.0004747779,0.008413522,0.0004877981,0.00728313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002123167,0.00004720531,0.00187758,0.0001345742,0.000006734269,0.0009042638,0.9701766,0.0008653184,0.0006486953,0.005810795,0.01948176,0.00002522827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456575,0.0003823562,0.01928137,0.006275876,0.00007124172,0.0005530305,0.00008771978,0.0001007738,0.02759006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867034,0.0001356289,0.008183666,0.0004686308,0.00001323294,0.0002354195,0.00003645048,0.00004596611,0.004177524],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1927568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3832696,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07174807026645415,"score_gpt":0.4032803779885901,"score_spread":0.331532307722136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}