{"id":"W2944651689","doi":"10.1080/17565529.2019.1609402","title":"When Anthropocene shocks contest conventional mentalities: a case study from Cape Town","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate and Development","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Reflexivity; Context (archaeology); Governmentality; CONTEST; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Cape; Environmental ethics; Climate change; Political science; History; Social science; Psychology; Archaeology; Social psychology; Politics; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003186837,0.0008585926,0.0006409843,0.001786449,0.02716104,0.007342958,0.002833253,0.003719388,0.006309185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0109955,0.0006949003,0.0003933879,0.002889089,0.01688549,0.004554963,0.006413403,0.005015588,0.0004502836],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02361469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009189816,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3011544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4958336,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962921,0.002133903,0.00009554601,0.0002892447,0.000363136,0.0008261118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943479,0.003388232,0.0005071741,0.0002876672,0.0004258751,0.001043095],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004020709,0.0000869791,0.003970197,0.00009860103,0.000009578049,0.0207216,0.9610391,0.0001754837,0.0005875744,0.008121707,0.00206279,0.003086147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006908627,0.00002804852,0.004298759,0.0001489205,0.000008508015,0.0008533576,0.9753415,0.0001398162,0.0001898196,0.001032548,0.01793143,0.00002042914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742052,0.000414755,0.0005897201,0.007777955,0.00006300939,0.0001201442,0.00008466397,0.000008915707,0.01673562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929276,0.0005842605,0.0005340657,0.0007360628,0.00002975605,0.00006889768,0.00003454245,0.00001998464,0.00506486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3011544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.598803,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02325919490795618,"score_gpt":0.2540701261987097,"score_spread":0.2308109312907535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}