{"id":"W2944651689","doi":"10.1080/17565529.2019.1609402","title":"When Anthropocene shocks contest conventional mentalities: a case study from Cape Town","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Climate and Development","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Anthropocene; Reflexivity; Context (archaeology); Governmentality; CONTEST; Sociology; Resilience (materials science); Psychological resilience; Cape; Environmental ethics; Climate change; Political science; History; Social science; Psychology; Archaeology; Social psychology; Politics; Law; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002459326,0.0001850095,0.0002116735,0.00001644185,0.0002480699,0.00006075299,0.0001124807,0.00004865212,0.02072519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000104878,0.0001669517,0.00002758824,0.00005409495,0.0001451951,0.0002172196,0.0003893546,0.00007768804,0.0004521973],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003351507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000296301,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001955706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001015019,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985562,0.00003855877,0.000298759,0.0004628171,0.0002965886,0.0003470776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995054,0.00006961264,0.00008829338,0.0002080496,0.0000139128,0.0001147281],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005313619,0.0004597101,0.964904,0.00003434975,0.00003543854,0.0005329941,0.03117848,0.000006163442,0.0001224008,0.00001962217,0.0007456822,0.001908062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003808751,0.0003902949,0.4296565,0.00007435543,0.00003831664,0.0003708287,0.5313624,0.0001401916,0.0007135757,0.0004635985,0.03217279,0.0008084557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947935,0.0001288772,0.000009471765,0.0001171476,0.0001919429,0.0005719067,0.0000570917,0.00003639845,0.00409369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983739,0.00006408648,0.0004617386,0.0003227274,0.00001847619,0.00006469696,0.00004387271,0.00001194109,0.000638604],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5352475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98017,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02325919490795618,"score_gpt":0.2540701261987097,"score_spread":0.2308109312907535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}