{"id":"W2945388533","doi":"10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.006","title":"Are oral fluid testing devices effective for the roadside detection of recent cannabis use? A systematic review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Public Health","topic":"Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Government of Ontario","keywords":"Cannabis; CINAHL; Medicine; MEDLINE; Driving under the influence; Medical physics; Meta-analysis; Poison control; Computer science; Human factors and ergonomics; Emergency medicine; Pathology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01047459,0.00060982,0.004896492,0.0003300966,0.0006308951,0.00004462913,0.0006182072,0.0007441337,0.0001248922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01243671,0.0003813919,0.0008816838,0.001505021,0.0002200985,0.0001660738,0.0001229708,0.001324709,0.0000748352],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007052677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001587033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002544335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001068487,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9896122,0.006476617,0.00209198,0.0006461092,0.0002690227,0.0009040785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9848434,0.008818597,0.004529323,0.0007278444,0.0007400357,0.0003407937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009019841,0.0000805283,0.00002727504,0.5679992,0.001382279,0.000001480283,0.00005568516,0.000007651655,2.268894e-7,0.00004408563,0.002829269,0.4275633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002882306,0.0001950204,0.00003767674,0.08511674,0.008843577,0.0000644344,0.00006270836,0.0005570262,0.000002276591,0.00000862516,0.9045196,0.0003040385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007298744,0.9816126,0.0003180035,0.003420617,0.001307673,0.01296107,0.0002229641,0.00008528188,0.0000644645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002454447,0.9876459,0.00007399319,0.00730197,0.0001765495,0.004077693,0.0001005917,0.00006552698,0.0003123585],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4078707820342394,"score_gpt":0.5137485649184081,"score_spread":0.1058777828841687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}