{"id":"W2945574805","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-02-2018-3343","title":"Substantive and symbolic strategies sustaining the environmentally friendly ideology","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Sociology; The Symbolic; Context (archaeology); Sustainability; Originality; Rationalization (economics); Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Law; Political science; Politics; Qualitative research; Ecology; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007597192,0.000519065,0.0006420724,0.0003097002,0.001791437,0.00315994,0.0007341551,0.000218383,0.0007311254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002498974,0.0004209509,0.0002493059,0.0007159284,0.000613503,0.005069193,0.0007989671,0.001411585,0.0002538555],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003288612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003411651,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008065564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003372805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9955888,0.000143503,0.001365957,0.0008293865,0.0009575128,0.001114852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995222,0.001069494,0.002429327,0.0006513037,0.0005809093,0.00004699652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353838,0.00007302446,0.9707639,0.0001706597,0.00008902884,0.0000463401,0.001032598,0.0002307969,0.005321178,0.007964778,0.0002191313,0.01395319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001397527,0.00007046847,0.8316615,0.0002298733,0.0002378901,0.000519351,0.1043908,0.003135889,0.00008867017,0.03740696,0.01972081,0.001140235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886622,0.000257339,0.0002109014,0.001381074,0.0008926553,0.0006228316,0.00000287829,0.0001804208,0.007789699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961143,0.00002578216,0.0001542129,0.001369633,0.002131939,0.00001660089,0.000009659505,0.00007811059,0.00009983713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1391024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998242,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009752127144287732,"score_gpt":0.2390458635233531,"score_spread":0.2292937363790653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}