{"id":"W2945745652","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.05.032","title":"Opportunistic occupancy-count estimation using sensor fusion: A case study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Building and Environment","topic":"Building Energy and Comfort Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada; Carleton University","funders":"National Research Council Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Occupancy; Sensor fusion; Real-time computing; Computer science; Workspace; Linear regression; Electricity; Ground truth; Count data; Simulation; Statistics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Electrical engineering; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001644064,0.0006468309,0.0006375156,0.0004011335,0.0006429628,0.001107247,0.001487978,0.001716372,0.001289094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00366141,0.0003084169,0.0005540874,0.001047092,0.0007026513,0.0009619147,0.0009032329,0.0005689215,0.0002370786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006175658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007443186,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008460066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01194312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987754,0.0005150694,0.000046773,0.0001864215,0.000292812,0.0001835425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962167,0.002634608,0.0002104028,0.0004400353,0.000323841,0.0001743285],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001429102,0.001280869,0.04894892,0.0003850623,0.0003327646,0.008470431,0.000868104,0.805891,0.009030931,0.007448184,0.005088517,0.1108261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008411537,0.0005073256,0.01053142,0.00001536373,0.00007293963,0.001515353,0.0008043859,0.9747809,0.006201132,0.00295896,0.002485713,0.00004239521],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8464371,0.000459334,0.1423266,0.0007616593,0.00007492267,0.0002205799,0.0007807181,0.0005247656,0.008414285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828839,0.00007439615,0.01597269,0.00002673063,0.00001370515,0.00002815901,0.0001269486,0.00001987005,0.0008537259],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008460066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01682168,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01621514016799703,"score_gpt":0.2200111747027977,"score_spread":0.2037960345348007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}