{"id":"W2945795829","doi":"10.1097/xeb.0000000000000165","title":"A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Unification; Variety (cybernetics); Data science; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Management science; Risk analysis (engineering); External validity; Knowledge management; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6579881,0.00905088,0.01485986,0.04743161,0.007483368,0.02816524,0.0173909,0.02101468,0.008103685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.621257,0.005011052,0.02127021,0.02251436,0.03848011,0.0184249,0.0223817,0.02511073,0.003037538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02345137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05034805,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00826963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006434666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1712459,0.6875853,0.08394013,0.01401218,0.04114822,0.002068247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2201572,0.6671081,0.03318277,0.02338792,0.05368064,0.002483387],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002321789,0.00008543585,0.001422047,0.02944723,0.003117067,0.0004056425,0.006396105,0.004557887,0.0003026963,0.7712557,0.01475265,0.1680254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004679651,0.0003264086,0.0008802524,0.02976173,0.001553455,0.0007876772,0.00110899,0.008025677,0.0004454865,0.8939674,0.06234472,0.000330227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003621107,0.02976996,0.931612,0.02204977,0.002067673,0.007734663,0.000473567,0.0003811418,0.005549085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01005581,0.009744486,0.9566466,0.004261384,0.001176376,0.01743305,0.0002298524,0.00007424197,0.0003782441],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3420119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4217616,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9926379136441166,"score_gpt":0.8093812354542618,"score_spread":0.1832566781898548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}