{"id":"W2945814767","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13407","title":"A comprehensive large‐scale assessment of fisheries bycatch risk to threatened seabird populations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; British Antarctic Survey; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Bycatch; Demersal zone; Fishery; Pelagic zone; Seabird; Fishing; Geography; Threatened species; Population; Fisheries management; Oceanography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000233404,0.0001070004,0.0003662544,0.00005954287,0.0000909837,0.000005599714,0.0002141712,0.0001300139,0.004803835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007332603,0.00009151161,0.0000818848,0.0001477646,0.00009816772,0.000088482,0.0001487075,0.0002419323,0.0002907873],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001448906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000320349,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001243256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006122503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989677,0.00005040974,0.0004240756,0.0001556369,0.0001584205,0.0002437293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991885,0.00007997826,0.0004310836,0.0001679014,0.00003257869,0.00009999818],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008039925,0.0002371714,0.9886616,0.000004212955,0.00002332709,0.000005022481,0.0004642508,0.003216155,0.005427936,0.00006616451,0.001411458,0.000402268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006915023,0.0004877342,0.9943876,0.000002531204,0.00005800285,0.00001958753,0.0007266368,0.00005023838,0.0004724865,0.0009346376,0.002078784,0.0000902688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947131,0.000002786709,0.0003023884,0.0004488508,0.0003208616,0.000284408,0.00001225109,0.000006805515,0.003908535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869705,0.0000100288,0.01240901,0.0003438972,0.00002582164,0.00001105652,0.000002743185,0.000009811756,0.0002171687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01210662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01434031150464458,"score_gpt":0.2734784460628583,"score_spread":0.2591381345582137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}