{"id":"W2945814767","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.13407","title":"A comprehensive large‐scale assessment of fisheries bycatch risk to threatened seabird populations","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; British Antarctic Survey; Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Bycatch; Demersal zone; Fishery; Pelagic zone; Seabird; Fishing; Geography; Threatened species; Population; Fisheries management; Oceanography; Ecology; Biology; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001140991,0.000438572,0.0002745764,0.002178539,0.0003195145,0.0006956626,0.0004240157,0.0003027667,0.0006660926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001778248,0.0002068837,0.0004347971,0.00116589,0.0001998392,0.0006491446,0.001386968,0.0002714171,0.00018131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005753831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004218752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02007247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05327958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995579,0.0001214027,0.00003696689,0.0001659961,0.00006261422,0.00005519619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984604,0.0002460273,0.0007023246,0.0001566326,0.0002383824,0.000196183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000271034,0.00002647643,0.9906054,0.00002752186,0.0001994934,0.00003660904,0.0001088463,0.003110505,0.0004851228,0.00006161164,0.0004874411,0.004823811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002498406,0.00004046396,0.9947515,0.00002001137,0.00003463004,0.00003977653,0.0001968254,0.004292644,0.00007355682,0.00008228874,0.0004600462,0.000005728281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950251,0.00008676957,0.0007403189,0.00003564101,0.000002834513,0.00002057513,0.003660553,0.00002336761,0.0004048368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936859,0.00006677082,0.001473301,0.00001962093,0.000005346306,0.00003677233,0.004537399,0.000003926933,0.0001709837],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02007247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03991127,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01434031150464458,"score_gpt":0.2734784460628583,"score_spread":0.2591381345582137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}