{"id":"W2946148733","doi":"10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.005","title":"Sarcasm between siblings: Children's use of relationship information in processing ironic remarks","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pragmatics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sarcasm; Psychology; Irony; Comprehension; Object (grammar); Attribution; Gaze; Literal and figurative language; Sibling; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009237957,0.00008982139,0.0002634031,0.0004876399,0.0000255463,0.00004820738,0.0001208496,0.000137968,0.0001339404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004928606,0.00007566187,0.00007719482,0.0003412835,0.00002394139,0.001169699,0.00001615595,0.0004091847,0.0000518013],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005023036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000844286,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001650496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000464365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984142,0.0001506085,0.0009497815,0.00005599982,0.0002888193,0.0001405577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980459,0.0003133375,0.001229883,0.0001499156,0.0002191385,0.00004187996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001273039,0.0001827204,0.9387548,0.0002773215,0.0001161814,0.00000603783,0.01865469,0.000375873,0.0001039409,0.002131894,0.0005955723,0.03867365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693358,0.0002191117,0.9902804,0.000505282,0.0001332484,0.00008730838,0.00251586,0.0003227984,0.0001021967,0.00366848,0.0003324333,0.0001394508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926487,0.0002036473,0.004475088,0.0001102155,0.0001763942,0.0001932296,0.00000677796,0.000006896556,0.002179094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955767,0.00001458546,0.004103898,0.00007632459,0.0001010275,0.000001290188,0.00001940408,0.00000964566,0.00009706656],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05152566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3085402,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02612608026635664,"score_gpt":0.301005433896603,"score_spread":0.2748793536302463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}