{"id":"W2946207961","doi":"10.23919/date.2019.8715150","title":"Methodology for EM Fault Injection: Charge-based Fault Model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Cryptographic Implementations and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fault injection; Computer science; Fault model; Fault (geology); Key (lock); Embedded system; Fault coverage; Set (abstract data type); Stuck-at fault; Reliability engineering; Software; Fault detection and isolation; Electrical engineering; Computer security; Engineering; Operating system; Electronic circuit; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005002141,0.0001000642,0.0001459848,0.0001512567,0.0001150728,0.00008086493,0.0003649281,0.00006015164,0.0001908759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002349684,0.00008770293,0.0001119269,0.0003159565,0.00001419636,0.0002290157,0.00006225002,0.00006930933,0.00004455592],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007343377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004385885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008235859,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990311,0.00006260896,0.0001975127,0.0003303701,0.0001358546,0.0002425703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991505,0.0002123211,0.00005741014,0.0003947915,0.0001326707,0.00005232447],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002243268,0.00009371865,0.0005208288,0.00003065539,0.0000260057,4.202261e-7,0.001354254,0.009567317,0.001870547,0.9598187,0.004498896,0.02219624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007269319,0.0001644216,0.00009137846,0.00000178323,0.000004498937,0.000003317277,0.0001075325,0.9728096,0.002326906,0.01942685,0.004201401,0.0001354094],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0520219,0.00001091978,0.9450928,0.0009078735,0.0003762373,0.0003924821,0.000009991647,0.0001397986,0.001048002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4161708,0.000001436729,0.5814998,0.001588947,0.00002971551,0.00007224696,0.00001408565,0.00000602421,0.0006169066],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3576422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08790962796678346,"score_gpt":0.3516670382339161,"score_spread":0.2637574102671326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}