{"id":"W2946207961","doi":"10.23919/date.2019.8715150","title":"Methodology for EM Fault Injection: Charge-based Fault Model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Cryptographic Implementations and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Fault injection; Computer science; Fault model; Fault (geology); Key (lock); Embedded system; Fault coverage; Set (abstract data type); Stuck-at fault; Reliability engineering; Software; Fault detection and isolation; Electrical engineering; Computer security; Engineering; Operating system; Electronic circuit; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006112287,0.0006106092,0.0004923414,0.0008415326,0.0003015907,0.0007175574,0.002193366,0.001064857,0.003768091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001206353,0.0002507197,0.00073013,0.0004330623,0.0008205081,0.001887196,0.0006693253,0.001149989,0.0009385635],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007702836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007898574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001260915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009431173,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999504,0.0000812614,0.00002811958,0.00007541342,0.0002662457,0.0000449609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994859,0.0001514995,0.00006079312,0.0001563149,0.0001307441,0.0000147986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001353098,0.0001574659,0.0008882706,0.0003460878,0.00004230667,0.0003251367,0.0002001486,0.62017,0.04220095,0.2604876,0.002590782,0.07245601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002608884,0.0001553147,0.0001635246,0.00002983211,0.00002038804,0.0002214626,0.00002198692,0.9391047,0.01287415,0.03646265,0.01089823,0.0000217329],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.005280008,0.0001851652,0.9893655,0.0001239653,0.00004883549,0.0001262276,0.00007193853,0.0004322118,0.004366229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5617105,0.001073109,0.4204593,0.000360356,0.0001169411,0.0007231131,0.000322077,0.0003347525,0.01489992],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003768091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01260549,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08790962796678346,"score_gpt":0.3516670382339161,"score_spread":0.2637574102671326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}