{"id":"W2946319854","doi":"10.7202/1059651ar","title":"L’abduction comme mode d’inférence et méthode de recherche : de l’origine à aujourd’hui","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Recherches qualitatives","topic":"Education, sociology, and vocational training","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02258313,0.001416181,0.001665999,0.004774733,0.002565707,0.01342073,0.003254466,0.006407724,0.01017401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04057251,0.001396236,0.002927536,0.004315143,0.03434433,0.02217446,0.005684363,0.009352444,0.004054502],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006839576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00571265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009682782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005314203,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9723074,0.01658767,0.00138715,0.004219506,0.004946718,0.0005514732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9448248,0.04249099,0.001401266,0.00691625,0.003901681,0.0004650406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004543967,0.00001325488,0.0003858779,0.0004397594,0.00003979931,0.00009999249,0.002740554,0.0009028376,0.0005048108,0.9493248,0.004345965,0.04115688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003334089,0.00004530985,0.0005785558,0.0008152224,0.00004063982,0.0004675962,0.001062388,0.006523001,0.002803068,0.7474895,0.2400569,0.00008448253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.004281376,0.03289158,0.8669586,0.04744156,0.001551373,0.0001044907,0.0002289212,0.0007463111,0.04579586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1698102,0.03567573,0.7120461,0.009415681,0.003288342,0.0007024968,0.0003887815,0.001109128,0.0675635],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02258313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1194324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9086615372661129,"score_gpt":0.671259306291925,"score_spread":0.2374022309741879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}