{"id":"W2946519248","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2019.05.002","title":"Basin level gendered vulnerabilities and adaptation: A case of Gandaki River Basin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Development","topic":"Agricultural risk and resilience","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Department for International Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Structural basin; Geography; Vulnerability (computing); Socioeconomic status; Psychological resilience; Adaptive capacity; Adaptation (eye); Citizen journalism; Gender analysis; Political science; Climate change; Sociology; Demography; Psychology; Population; Social psychology; Computer security; Ecology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001147557,0.0001305116,0.0001484159,0.000007066844,0.0001444436,0.00001344812,0.00007745899,0.00005342595,0.0008419001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000053533,0.00004781322,0.000035092,0.00005792742,0.0001222227,0.000105792,0.00009144228,0.00005921807,0.00007009823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005096447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006721992,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001894692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009890161,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00004211207,0.0002251376,0.0002526551,0.0001799031,0.0001680018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997351,0.00007427599,0.00007385469,0.0000370156,0.000005749614,0.00007396184],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007545938,0.0002842619,0.4003638,0.0000397477,0.0000521793,0.0001018266,0.009488782,0.00006606241,0.1573958,0.0001901882,0.0002576154,0.4316842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001788047,0.00009351507,0.9735978,0.00001433186,0.000004788005,0.0001630168,0.007002656,0.0000589671,0.01207131,0.00004455474,0.006589574,0.0001806323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.99911,0.0001766417,0.00001016867,0.0001096487,0.00005667522,0.0002133988,0.00003822544,0.00001157344,0.0002737102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953351,0.00007721075,0.002104497,0.00006059908,0.0000209929,0.000009627163,0.00003718232,7.581176e-7,0.002354034],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.573234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9218216,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02203436243087324,"score_gpt":0.1881151453566611,"score_spread":0.1660807829257879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}