{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007753392,0.0001273665,0.0002560094,0.00003693074,0.004408911,0.0001047199,0.0003315654,0.00005667783,0.0002760552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002528247,0.0001109924,0.00009340083,0.0003028645,0.0002252628,0.000613923,0.0001024232,0.0003240227,0.00003002223],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006758831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000369572,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01313762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03034055,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978711,0.0003338911,0.0004624177,0.0002283558,0.0007440968,0.000360134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988807,0.0001492206,0.000241668,0.0001119113,0.0001929201,0.0004236025],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001029204,0.003816897,0.007053419,0.0004011663,0.0004833716,0.1076451,0.6732554,0.0002965053,0.0003873017,0.1430194,0.009728752,0.05288345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001733231,0.002512946,0.000241928,0.0002079041,0.000731189,0.003374702,0.2548732,0.00008909948,0.0001299591,0.001527979,0.7340718,0.0005060853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8947093,0.0002967525,0.0000324539,0.005127698,0.001171994,0.0003623358,0.00002591048,0.00005184436,0.09822168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980025,0.00006168004,0.0002006736,0.0008826001,0.0007927546,0.000003721407,3.329578e-7,0.000009332177,0.00004642319],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.724343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1326764055532584,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.2363614609173472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}