{"id":"W2946648245","doi":"10.7202/1070286ar","title":"Judicial Audiences: A Case Study of Justice David Watt’s Literary Judgments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Transparency (behavior); Judicial opinion; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01504293,0.001048511,0.001155614,0.005562123,0.07246704,0.0253062,0.00437134,0.01516873,0.007797997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05363877,0.0009644065,0.001017676,0.005203456,0.02840247,0.01082812,0.0169403,0.02040383,0.001215641],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01857799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008846222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05005175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1048893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9712123,0.01538174,0.000838932,0.002565747,0.005929635,0.004071712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9611871,0.02851035,0.002053523,0.0009511588,0.003192021,0.004105795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002590171,0.00008051419,0.001411114,0.00007748559,0.000009178404,0.01718388,0.8991557,0.0000507665,0.0004435158,0.0561168,0.01902424,0.006420885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001471968,0.00003592721,0.001631055,0.0003468706,0.00001616092,0.003339359,0.7721323,0.0002147894,0.00040894,0.007643329,0.2141546,0.00006212101],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5474949,0.005282845,0.002957563,0.1249014,0.002594809,0.0002679269,0.00009793846,0.00009898139,0.3163036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315285,0.00184792,0.001131739,0.02555764,0.001203897,0.0001409833,0.00004050063,0.0002026361,0.0383462],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07246704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1347933,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1326764055532584,"score_gpt":0.3690378664706056,"score_spread":0.2363614609173472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}