{"id":"W2947001235","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.05.016","title":"Assessing preferences for growth on the rural-urban fringe using a stated choice analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Landscape and Urban Planning","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry","funders":"National Institute of Food and Agriculture; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Recreation; Metropolitan area; Stakeholder; Geography; Environmental planning; Urbanization; Scale (ratio); Unemployment; Environmental resource management; Typology; Business; Socioeconomics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004243114,0.0003897013,0.0005034169,0.0006483312,0.0003795919,0.002096564,0.0006087216,0.0008963221,0.006371073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01380627,0.0002053685,0.0009728377,0.0007578297,0.0006440016,0.001470433,0.0007690635,0.0009845425,0.0003801456],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001142858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006117594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005340261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01017922,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979394,0.001612264,0.00004910659,0.0001135866,0.0001441308,0.0001414258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842067,0.0136275,0.0007268945,0.0004398146,0.0003768659,0.0006223003],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007648531,0.003195444,0.4767264,0.0003162658,0.001127282,0.0007523236,0.002968004,0.3174678,0.006033523,0.08476004,0.002599531,0.09640478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001922075,0.001912533,0.1232828,0.00004841683,0.0001854445,0.0001849685,0.004230065,0.8255146,0.001760784,0.04037654,0.002216095,0.00009550762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9873782,0.00004319257,0.01004921,0.000199765,0.000004937841,0.00003839015,0.0002030142,0.00001061019,0.002072765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960325,0.00002493243,0.003385247,0.00001247201,0.000002977956,0.00002281362,0.0001118548,0.000002870257,0.0004042546],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006371073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02244002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.115576631404128,"score_gpt":0.2557882245884792,"score_spread":0.1402115931843512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}