{"id":"W2947022664","doi":"10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.6509","title":"The impact of routine ESAS use on overall survival: Results of a population-based retrospective matched cohort analysis.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; McMaster University; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Baker Hughes (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Propensity score matching; Proportional hazards model; Cancer; Cohort; Internal medicine; Comorbidity; Cohort study; Population; Survival analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001979087,0.0003009146,0.0002636035,0.0007153719,0.000482873,0.0004854498,0.0003894704,0.0003305183,0.001417273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002806889,0.0003373811,0.001004354,0.0009220708,0.0002494605,0.0004569525,0.0005042737,0.0003929497,0.0002206459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005510453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006190853,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01706661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0226407,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991617,0.0002171629,0.00008169077,0.0002488601,0.0001594963,0.000131037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984817,0.000262967,0.0005894635,0.0002925587,0.0001732952,0.0002000334],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004326664,0.00004508902,0.9982148,0.00000751804,0.0002136565,0.00004882376,0.00004980068,0.00002555833,0.0001078051,0.00001059731,0.0001056145,0.0007380399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005398562,0.0003918265,0.9984114,0.000004325776,0.0002118823,0.0001667877,0.00012616,0.0002395649,0.0000696913,0.00001576396,0.0003031143,0.000005439691],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988337,0.0001431743,0.000154349,0.00001716535,0.000006667331,0.00002120414,0.0006512977,0.00000317172,0.0001692659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991417,0.00005649884,0.0001081618,0.00002073898,0.000007526865,0.00001302676,0.0005438635,0.000001897975,0.0001065687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01706661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03393453,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08710106740873273,"score_gpt":0.4617616227388621,"score_spread":0.3746605553301294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}