{"id":"W2947022664","doi":"10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.6509","title":"The impact of routine ESAS use on overall survival: Results of a population-based retrospective matched cohort analysis.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","topic":"Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers","field":"Medicine","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; McMaster University; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; Baker Hughes (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Propensity score matching; Proportional hazards model; Cancer; Cohort; Internal medicine; Comorbidity; Cohort study; Population; Survival analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005141414,0.0001360473,0.002380172,0.0001959279,0.00002413155,0.00000646337,0.0001686641,0.0002620376,0.0002108283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006660866,0.00007474284,0.001547661,0.0003159845,0.0001219251,0.00008865843,0.00002194606,0.0007436129,0.000003520797],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005102467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00158523,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00173716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002670981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954702,0.0006017696,0.003020527,0.0001928477,0.0005338154,0.0001808211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876921,0.007059867,0.003827235,0.0004462606,0.0007824356,0.0001921397],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.03258764,0.0006331635,0.9562439,0.00001042823,0.003308894,0.00002327379,0.0000415154,0.004637355,0.0001654986,0.00005816262,0.0009576009,0.001332607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01216223,0.01276376,0.9707147,0.00004412077,0.0009603156,0.000005036131,0.00002414901,0.002625909,0.00004555205,0.00007652507,0.0005153385,0.00006229991],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955341,0.00003773773,0.00002706264,0.001472273,0.0005193953,0.000266782,0.00004579962,0.00000403244,0.002092868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983872,0.0001376367,0.0003752293,0.0004620738,0.0002277725,7.964633e-7,0.000032354,0.00001185326,0.000365114],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02042541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.797416,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08710106740873273,"score_gpt":0.4617616227388621,"score_spread":0.3746605553301294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}