{"id":"W2947049706","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.05.029","title":"Goftte: A R package for assessing goodness-of-fit in proportional (sub) distributions hazards regression models","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Institut National Du Cancer","keywords":"Goodness of fit; Statistics; Computer science; Regression analysis; Censoring (clinical trials); Monte Carlo method; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02001722,0.002779435,0.003138648,0.003423974,0.0005978089,0.002740461,0.004244373,0.001726042,0.08336397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1608305,0.00177263,0.00452453,0.003004824,0.001203383,0.002547852,0.003076634,0.004138812,0.02277449],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008602103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003775069,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003782621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004661701,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9853871,0.009957395,0.001183491,0.001275948,0.001752956,0.000443155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8918146,0.09333287,0.003497947,0.007368069,0.003470823,0.0005157504],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002098841,0.0003471783,0.0211252,0.00709581,0.006652858,0.001283001,0.0009207524,0.06664164,0.001734791,0.06183724,0.4903015,0.3399612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00245503,0.001058532,0.01327238,0.001771489,0.00331711,0.002630983,0.000357204,0.4572818,0.005501463,0.1854024,0.3265062,0.0004453366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"software","genre_scores_codex":[0.006418076,0.0008225497,0.8645379,0.0006986167,0.0004396464,0.0006923677,0.03623035,0.08718932,0.00297113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07645782,0.0008006832,0.8268347,0.0007808029,0.0002544305,0.006254279,0.02713745,0.05352636,0.007953456],"genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08336397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2788802,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.555451432145992,"score_gpt":0.5929846527981623,"score_spread":0.03753322065217024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}