{"id":"W2947121292","doi":"10.3389/fevo.2020.00081","title":"Using Environmental DNA to Monitor the Reintroduction Success of the Rhine Sculpin (Cottus rhenanus) in a Restored Stream","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Electrofishing; Sculpin; Cottus; Environmental DNA; Biological dispersal; Threatened species; Biomonitoring; Ecology; Biology; Population; Fishery; Freshwater ecosystem; Indicator species; Biodiversity; Ecosystem; Abundance (ecology); Fish <Actinopterygii>; Habitat","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003348227,0.0003851207,0.0001816618,0.0005998985,0.0002405052,0.0002661864,0.0002444285,0.0003307734,0.0004849157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004855523,0.0001332315,0.0001520529,0.0003267643,0.0003670706,0.0001833061,0.0002767369,0.0002403995,0.00009926588],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002452715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000262986,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006523232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02420786,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997423,0.00004078387,0.0000177849,0.0001190494,0.00005173256,0.00002840903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996129,0.00004516789,0.000201211,0.00002072064,0.00007021814,0.0000498632],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001592412,0.0001652001,0.8010269,0.00008663626,0.00007729937,0.0005642365,0.001031152,0.0005820381,0.1765511,0.00006311662,0.0000724467,0.01962045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005881517,0.0007080615,0.986867,0.00002287794,0.00006268267,0.0004871852,0.0006668196,0.001029015,0.009508166,0.0000190783,0.0006117328,0.00001149438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.00005409714,0.000281932,0.000006374052,0.000002217745,0.00001353727,0.00005837904,0.000004981469,0.0001269366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972345,0.00009892323,0.001899627,0.00002052421,0.000001856309,0.00002366745,0.0002183072,0.000002756098,0.0004998147],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006523232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01297051,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01027204819329831,"score_gpt":0.196346450846308,"score_spread":0.1860744026530097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}