{"id":"W2947207361","doi":"10.1111/brv.12526","title":"Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; National Science Foundation, United Arab Emirates; Universidad Nacional de Córdoba; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft; Fondo para la Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; National Research Foundation; U.S. Forest Service; European Commission; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Mechanism (biology); Biodiversity; Life history theory; Prioritization; Variation (astronomy); Empirical evidence; Variety (cybernetics); Evolutionary biology; Biology; Ecology; Computer science; Management science; Sociology; Epistemology; Artificial intelligence; Life history; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04785627,0.001053192,0.001144371,0.005187805,0.001178151,0.00354838,0.001740201,0.002277172,0.005870563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2229427,0.0003816045,0.001297886,0.005426086,0.006920672,0.009114244,0.003256956,0.001956404,0.0005676949],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001910587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001612628,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003167701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003552265,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9757348,0.01778548,0.001168577,0.002140124,0.002774719,0.0003962099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6761852,0.27753,0.022125,0.01442642,0.007795575,0.001937853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00110863,0.000218019,0.6392496,0.003938633,0.00441646,0.0004667546,0.003181124,0.02040281,0.0009639804,0.09059096,0.002911559,0.2325515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001374764,0.002353749,0.5487978,0.003842815,0.003448079,0.0011938,0.005261183,0.02816666,0.002401334,0.3603847,0.0436776,0.0003346855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7410669,0.06304095,0.08867681,0.02510621,0.0006174293,0.0003747794,0.004401822,0.0001379405,0.0765771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851276,0.00352688,0.009038909,0.0009052465,0.0001792157,0.0001138751,0.0004858023,0.00003241197,0.0005900866],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04785627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2530912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1878898853743238,"score_gpt":0.3601747606429057,"score_spread":0.1722848752685818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}