{"id":"W2947736674","doi":"10.1088/1748-9326/ab2619","title":"Social-ecological network analysis for sustainability sciences: a systematic review and innovative research agenda for the future","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Research Letters","topic":"Ecosystem dynamics and resilience","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education; Liber Ero Foundation; U.S. Department of Agriculture; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; U.S. Department of Energy; Office of Research and Development; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Sustainability; Management science; Field (mathematics); Social network analysis; Computer science; Sociology; Ecology; Social science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02478477,0.0004755833,0.002304103,0.0002741174,0.002966524,0.000242649,0.001872096,0.0003093554,0.0002152528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001042007,0.0002688775,0.0007573811,0.00413426,0.003560336,0.0001496542,0.001594602,0.001178079,0.0001189972],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002680356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001468214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003539176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006249124,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910327,0.003002728,0.001035972,0.001483305,0.001772722,0.00167257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908035,0.007731187,0.0004360831,0.0008338997,0.00005096345,0.0001443547],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000216795,0.0002429065,0.0008796949,0.9442822,0.001582813,0.00001269054,0.0003128094,0.0002584746,0.000002871264,0.001089466,0.02930284,0.02201153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004965452,0.0007304091,0.001240002,0.03997983,0.006845825,0.00002598276,0.002797463,0.002064168,2.432243e-7,0.001244045,0.943079,0.001496497],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000754728,0.9732465,0.0003724437,0.003727779,0.00008339343,0.02219906,0.000187402,0.00001210275,0.00009589391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009478148,0.9892963,0.0001745429,0.0006043813,0.0002071725,0.007812885,0.00009494539,0.00004610791,0.0008158746],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9137762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999763,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1048186323188432,"score_gpt":0.4316341936000632,"score_spread":0.32681556128122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}