{"id":"W2947856622","doi":"10.15173/ijsap.v3i1.3511","title":"At the threshold: A case study of a partnership between a student organization and an educational development center","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Students as Partners","topic":"Higher Education Practises and Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Confusion; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Center (category theory); Sociology; Institution; Vulnerability (computing); Power (physics); Academic institution; Unit (ring theory); Pedagogy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Library science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01000671,0.0009701872,0.00112798,0.002066432,0.03616467,0.009872725,0.003741329,0.007637824,0.004395221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01955017,0.0008745847,0.0009472706,0.002334784,0.01245058,0.007791447,0.01397887,0.009524415,0.0008713088],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007139273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007749458,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01393897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03023943,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9790274,0.01555865,0.0004326991,0.001022289,0.001370162,0.002588887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809228,0.009584001,0.001507437,0.0006908212,0.001150217,0.006144838],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001411601,0.001056408,0.01230329,0.0002416494,0.00003600151,0.04185795,0.8966108,0.0006439348,0.0008070496,0.02755218,0.003871701,0.01487788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002326844,0.0002554567,0.001887801,0.000251193,0.00001615888,0.00690143,0.9559013,0.0007964141,0.0004275496,0.003767931,0.02973009,0.00004145995],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9487931,0.001017819,0.01264065,0.01219234,0.0002377788,0.0003642616,0.00009513008,0.0000536925,0.02460532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985647,0.000884806,0.004748628,0.001555992,0.00006660473,0.0001941282,0.00004343918,0.0000461281,0.006813203],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03616467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05292118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1015597789282928,"score_gpt":0.5661208193453442,"score_spread":0.4645610404170514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}