{"id":"W2947858844","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2018-0778","title":"Identification of unbalanced bids based on grey-fuzzy evaluation method","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Grey System Theory Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Identification (biology); Grey relational analysis; Fuzzy logic; Closeness; Data mining; Rank (graph theory); Fuzzy set; Mathematics; Relation (database); Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Ranking (information retrieval); Mathematical optimization; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009257874,0.0001007876,0.0002753846,0.001095606,0.00003956931,0.00008783818,0.0005729205,0.00006376312,0.0005238949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003260994,0.00008935969,0.0001220091,0.0008901163,0.00001780526,0.000232648,0.00000576456,0.0001426564,0.00008547468],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002176446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007421001,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008025876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002723165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975526,0.0001995995,0.0009298929,0.0001780009,0.0009671128,0.0001728137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966463,0.0007641069,0.000645402,0.000559307,0.001118841,0.0002660558],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007968701,0.000007823412,0.002969917,0.00001585396,0.00001741733,0.00000191755,0.0002336151,0.9555536,0.03260319,0.004578989,0.0005670468,0.003442658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009590347,0.0001389682,0.06047315,0.0002584516,0.00006072566,0.00003819988,0.0003067623,0.9104268,0.009598673,0.01146297,0.0060149,0.0002613617],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4011587,0.0002301087,0.5862188,0.0007554459,0.002149374,0.0006728137,0.00004533432,0.00001623913,0.00875316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988104,3.68367e-7,0.0009425201,0.00003106145,0.00006323861,0.000006870553,0.000001623047,0.0000140175,0.0001299592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5976516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5736282,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04202163030911668,"score_gpt":0.3340866601611711,"score_spread":0.2920650298520544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}