{"id":"W2948293324","doi":"10.1007/s10877-019-00330-y","title":"Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","topic":"Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy","field":"Medicine","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Radboud Universiteit; Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum; London Health Sciences Centre","keywords":"Medicine; Limits of agreement; Cardiac output; Anesthesiology; Meta-analysis; Critically ill; Pooled analysis; Internal medicine; Cardiology; Gold standard (test); Study heterogeneity; Bland–Altman plot; Cochrane Library; Hemodynamics; Anesthesia; Nuclear medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02013285,0.002676801,0.02160934,0.006999559,0.0006537221,0.004196294,0.002486921,0.002701149,0.002820158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04732094,0.001590233,0.0402973,0.007185813,0.0009089745,0.001949935,0.00158323,0.001774196,0.0002790403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002460431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003270176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005725828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01251248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9862245,0.005883222,0.004648797,0.001420661,0.001486471,0.0003361921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9607773,0.03116712,0.004708816,0.001001985,0.002071252,0.0002736091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001438054,0.00001875284,0.004478164,0.4032682,0.5788399,0.0001097548,0.00008034449,0.0005473954,0.0001823885,0.0001103441,0.0005204235,0.01040629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003273914,0.00009988669,0.003235772,0.02220117,0.9725512,0.00008370044,0.00003008062,0.0001703168,0.0001061216,0.0001555505,0.001018563,0.00002026583],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.004165364,0.9941717,0.0005206243,0.0001518822,0.0001048588,0.0001892603,0.0004796813,0.00002157379,0.0001950031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1747188,0.818482,0.002620316,0.001004719,0.0003565255,0.001229968,0.001177368,0.00004901638,0.0003611528],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02160934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.106474,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1536856430843772,"score_gpt":0.4681716238381786,"score_spread":0.3144859807538014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}