{"id":"W2949051790","doi":"","title":"A DISPUTED ALTERNATIVE TO ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION - A DISCUSSION OF CLASS-WIDE ARBITRATION AND ITS RELEVANCE FOR QUEBEC CLASS ACTION LITIGANTS AND PRACTITIONERS","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Class action; Plaintiff; Supreme court; Compulsory arbitration; Dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Damages; Relevance (law); Civil procedure; Class (philosophy); Consolidation (business); Alternative dispute resolution; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science); Business; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0161472,0.0005573457,0.0007804713,0.00364484,0.01505851,0.0175717,0.006282214,0.00985301,0.007883883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01941013,0.0004109573,0.001199396,0.004035078,0.02979535,0.005819276,0.005080916,0.007349635,0.0005027151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06067109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02770689,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7284853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7737296,"domain_scores_codex":[0.981417,0.00772056,0.0005350926,0.00114283,0.006370465,0.002813971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930032,0.003710411,0.0003950596,0.0005303534,0.001995635,0.0003653578],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003188647,0.000004065806,0.00007996304,0.00001417462,0.000002060914,0.00008625197,0.0007452138,0.0002180027,0.00002797842,0.9930478,0.001618656,0.004152639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004320749,0.00003558625,0.002208705,0.0008750519,0.00003463984,0.0006546034,0.006563212,0.01002621,0.0004060744,0.5886961,0.3903231,0.0001335497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.03024173,0.04186966,0.05208067,0.1185538,0.00100846,0.0001619,0.0001393131,0.00005641016,0.7558881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9101951,0.01004387,0.01506589,0.008402065,0.0004788851,0.000168732,0.00004681222,0.00003736494,0.05556125],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2715147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5462273,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03620524836423736,"score_gpt":0.2909591379021896,"score_spread":0.2547538895379522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}