{"id":"W2949127040","doi":"10.1038/s41586-019-1306-0","title":"RETRACTED ARTICLE: Global analysis of streamflow response to forest management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Streamflow; Afforestation; Environmental science; Deforestation (computer science); Reforestation; Water resources; Climate change; Forest management; Vegetation (pathology); Hydrology (agriculture); Agroforestry; Water resource management; Geography; Ecology; Drainage basin; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":{"nature":"Retraction","reason":"Error in Analyses;Error in Data;Error in Methods;Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s);","date":"2/12/2020 0:00","openalex_flagged":true},"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003817659,0.001356237,0.001398537,0.003648319,0.002442915,0.004138271,0.003527536,0.008510386,0.02158117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03062646,0.0007323268,0.001233554,0.002140386,0.001699694,0.001965993,0.002065293,0.0068658,0.01191355],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003330253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003899474,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01930745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0245977,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972518,0.0003637868,0.0003671457,0.0004028268,0.00130681,0.0003075532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736033,0.008892755,0.001275329,0.001712808,0.0124575,0.002058414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000995114,0.0000421831,0.0005537288,0.0001051904,0.00002895643,0.000465344,0.00005457124,0.0001708657,0.0002675337,0.0004498331,0.986205,0.01155733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009183682,0.00009257643,0.01052249,0.0002704919,0.00009544901,0.0005707802,0.0002331365,0.00111117,0.001165206,0.002088381,0.9836965,0.00006185945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.001966848,0.001531398,0.002023382,0.1705851,0.8167071,0.00004700843,0.002574514,0.0007459979,0.0038187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04905965,0.005317716,0.007068289,0.2155016,0.5356777,0.0001898687,0.006869201,0.001848693,0.1784673],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07219625,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.002670199349405212,"score_gpt":0.2275057264635469,"score_spread":0.2248355271141416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}