{"id":"W2949150933","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1412.4134","title":"Characterizing an Entangled-Photon Source with Classical Detectors and Measurements","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Photon; Physics; Coincidence; Detector; Polarization (electrochemistry); Photon entanglement; Spontaneous parametric down-conversion; Coincidence detection in neurobiology; Parametric statistics; Quantum optics; Optics; Spontaneous emission; Coincidence counting; Laser; Quantum; Quantum entanglement; Quantum mechanics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001658177,0.0004888629,0.0004095993,0.0006465754,0.0004858051,0.001463876,0.001197218,0.001298349,0.0008587341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004020238,0.0004090214,0.0002925857,0.0008279691,0.002824628,0.003751651,0.001352437,0.00131544,0.0002437629],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009649714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009191923,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003293724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003862239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987105,0.0003699285,0.00005540496,0.0001652973,0.0006150813,0.00008383414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976431,0.001296903,0.0003433049,0.0005154557,0.0001300629,0.00007108608],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002705942,0.0003148986,0.007176835,0.0002395646,0.000105204,0.00023724,0.0002583981,0.08945353,0.297604,0.5717662,0.000761183,0.03181234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004182252,0.000168119,0.0008740123,0.00002861073,0.00002192989,0.0001650285,0.00005434186,0.5930058,0.285516,0.1170449,0.00301906,0.00006033353],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3952242,0.0002678848,0.5973992,0.0007267715,0.00005556377,0.0001034216,0.0002803502,0.0003114883,0.005631091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8607205,0.0002431648,0.1376933,0.0001380691,0.00003491601,0.0001296482,0.0001633858,0.00004443515,0.0008327495],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001658177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008769333,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0619165630603188,"score_gpt":0.1789399997200024,"score_spread":0.1170234366596836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}