{"id":"W2949226104","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00078","title":"FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Virtual screening; Computer science; Docking (animal); AutoDock; Pairwise comparison; Artificial intelligence; Monte Carlo method; Binding affinities; Machine learning; Data mining; Algorithm; Molecular dynamics; Mathematics; Chemistry; Computational chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002944186,0.003131047,0.002345252,0.001228173,0.00125238,0.002589524,0.006136908,0.001515728,0.007590818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056543,0.001175164,0.001838471,0.001778872,0.001037545,0.002934221,0.004931902,0.00360189,0.003306977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000922283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002265597,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01025973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01224766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985856,0.0003705714,0.000097244,0.0002923552,0.0005316459,0.000122631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982924,0.0005846511,0.00009170984,0.0005915511,0.0002901609,0.0001495068],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001332813,0.0003803011,0.008456047,0.001216597,0.0008634973,0.0005034953,0.000329025,0.6142699,0.02099263,0.01772141,0.04064503,0.2932893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001988001,0.0003003186,0.0009486002,0.00007645298,0.00006780869,0.0003058469,0.000079272,0.9626996,0.009496352,0.00948337,0.01625244,0.00009125205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1420791,0.00311041,0.7545222,0.0009869267,0.000649215,0.0004898735,0.005692676,0.08089711,0.01157253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3651534,0.002130526,0.6013958,0.0009931432,0.0001220339,0.0005607696,0.0149923,0.008658512,0.005993496],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01025973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02539384,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09107179002752398,"score_gpt":0.3513451604175254,"score_spread":0.2602733703900014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}