{"id":"W2949516261","doi":"10.1145/3328526.3329597","title":"The Vickrey Auction with a Single Duplicate Bidder Approximates the Optimal Revenue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Vickrey auction; Generalized second-price auction; Auction theory; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Revenue; Revenue equivalence; Computer science; Mathematical economics; Mathematical optimization; Common value auction; Mathematics; Economics; Microeconomics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00283722,0.0002349363,0.0002461121,0.00007574276,0.0009343426,0.0009550577,0.0017128,0.0001652139,0.000306693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003487433,0.00009314626,0.0001542812,0.0005012475,0.0004681591,0.0001320094,0.0006838866,0.0005541754,0.001661342],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003965797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001166033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003513007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004160948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973966,0.0002731042,0.0005211054,0.0007404572,0.0008134054,0.000255303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953359,0.00140598,0.0005885501,0.002244927,0.0003648888,0.00005970555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006891552,0.0006648556,0.001140441,0.00005524601,0.0005254312,0.000003231758,0.004752092,0.2014442,0.002225449,0.3555567,0.2941562,0.138787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002438636,0.00009135121,0.001340049,0.00004809881,0.00007827624,0.00006239521,0.004863393,0.01322979,0.003400623,0.3174611,0.6586958,0.000485309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1364705,0.0005760904,0.7612011,0.04994157,0.001939092,0.003717923,0.0001538131,0.0003644498,0.04563542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9082471,0.00005227577,0.002475614,0.0003878898,0.0003791719,0.0005639998,0.00001687098,0.00003406368,0.08784301],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7717766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999116,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09823905435850637,"score_gpt":0.3535534388864009,"score_spread":0.2553143845278945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}