{"id":"W2949519103","doi":"10.1101/003285","title":"Alignathon: A competitive assessment of whole genome alignment methods","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institutes of Health; National Human Genome Research Institute; Howard Hughes Medical Institute","keywords":"Benchmarking; Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Multiple sequence alignment; Variety (cybernetics); Genome; Code (set theory); Data mining; Data science; Machine learning; Sequence alignment; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Geography; Cartography; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1064257,0.004872318,0.002955787,0.009241063,0.003444182,0.008174155,0.008411562,0.005027756,0.008524657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1681926,0.001638167,0.00373172,0.006877821,0.001936981,0.006263266,0.01148652,0.00416626,0.003966158],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003586919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006707633,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007163728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007657221,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8789541,0.06093537,0.008111007,0.0111219,0.03679394,0.004083666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.840834,0.07668753,0.005714453,0.02071032,0.04730882,0.008744952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01533143,0.00333319,0.04174637,0.005850421,0.005836492,0.0008331425,0.002251004,0.1403843,0.02191456,0.02696333,0.2795441,0.4560117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00224065,0.003679502,0.01506441,0.0006347137,0.0007325428,0.0007405921,0.0009240334,0.8375031,0.02081711,0.02898662,0.08816215,0.0005145399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3036955,0.01271394,0.5195459,0.00593106,0.005374453,0.004450073,0.02108531,0.08869535,0.03850849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.350425,0.001380011,0.5611578,0.001008864,0.0005667835,0.003006246,0.05504777,0.0214802,0.005927351],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8935743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5628396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01424488620696818,"score_gpt":0.2753656689215552,"score_spread":0.2611207827145871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}