{"id":"W2949581086","doi":"","title":"CommitCoin: Carbon Dating Commitments with Bitcoin.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive","topic":"Blockchain Technology Applications and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Communication source; Proof-of-work system; Computer science; Cash; Protocol (science); Scheme (mathematics); Computer security; Commitment scheme; Power (physics); Electronic cash; Internet privacy; Business; Computer network; Payment; Cryptocurrency; World Wide Web; Cryptography; Mathematics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005498065,0.001020131,0.0008890227,0.001120215,0.002665367,0.005388049,0.002416281,0.002903315,0.01958605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01830016,0.0007360454,0.0006464759,0.002142231,0.00395921,0.01255738,0.007487806,0.004543394,0.004991218],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001999788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001889063,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001413409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001548041,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945787,0.002484049,0.0002195352,0.0005199801,0.001768307,0.0004293906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943151,0.002097274,0.000422656,0.002075624,0.0006069173,0.0004824653],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004555487,0.00008067465,0.0004145303,0.0001941586,0.00003199073,0.0003455504,0.0004231141,0.01252183,0.001563044,0.8948217,0.02240826,0.06673968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000902438,0.00004451872,0.0001423385,0.0001154085,0.00001818742,0.0002892338,0.0001155373,0.1080059,0.00444423,0.8066362,0.08004788,0.00005029597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.009355613,0.001415664,0.9293987,0.004149755,0.0009177577,0.0003970374,0.0003717087,0.005565166,0.04842855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5720713,0.002178923,0.3520573,0.00217193,0.0007879599,0.001051289,0.001416475,0.00256142,0.06570338],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01958605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0655219,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0210170690199519,"score_gpt":0.2428961978540281,"score_spread":0.2218791288340762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}