{"id":"W2949825392","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.math/0504303","title":"A conjecture on rational approximations to rational points","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"Polynomial and algebraic computation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Conjecture; Rational point; Mathematics; Point (geometry); Range (aeronautics); Variety (cybernetics); Lonely runner conjecture; Algebraic number; Pure mathematics; Collatz conjecture; Combinatorics; Mathematical analysis; Geometry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002095342,0.0002866309,0.0002406815,0.0002335734,0.0002089419,0.000224579,0.0008709547,0.0001770569,0.000108141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001185463,0.0002777777,0.0001368057,0.0002640578,0.0000309157,0.0002478269,0.0007254586,0.0004602839,0.001033064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000154015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004376716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001820214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002422779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980587,0.00008594402,0.000388811,0.0007464545,0.0004543472,0.000265769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987559,0.0001647198,0.0001808103,0.0005884032,0.0001426526,0.0001675629],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088121,0.001010477,0.01239488,0.0001221731,0.0002930847,0.0000379671,0.00545453,0.2671173,0.00175061,0.5908896,0.04564781,0.07519339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001617252,0.0003341127,0.5915031,0.0003784209,0.00004521534,0.00004766418,0.00002058199,0.265144,0.004799678,0.1023015,0.03183175,0.001976692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4731104,0.00003309136,0.4947772,0.02847544,0.001174427,0.0005351081,0.00003739493,0.0002425147,0.001614441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563044,0.000002856686,0.0362635,0.005116079,0.00123973,0.000144985,0.0002120927,0.00001672059,0.000699651],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5791082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03508272591058667,"score_gpt":0.2703400183440699,"score_spread":0.2352572924334832,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}