{"id":"W2949963325","doi":"10.31468/cjsdwr.728","title":"Harnessing Sources in the Humanities: A Corpus-based Investigation of Citation Practices in English Literary Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Academic Writing and Publishing","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Rhetorical question; Academic writing; Citation; Digital humanities; Field (mathematics); Scientific writing; Genre analysis; Sociology; Linguistics; Hard and soft science; Humanities; Literature; Social science; Computer science; Pedagogy; Art; Library science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009471508,0.0002274217,0.0004898818,0.01828434,0.004099826,0.006205343,0.0007855555,0.0006648378,0.001526549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03857484,0.0002576242,0.0001902358,0.02120464,0.005808188,0.005148372,0.004656821,0.0008814579,0.0002185298],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002026778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002748358,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003270759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00928646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922497,0.004177562,0.001179531,0.0007572687,0.001454197,0.0001817199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9210262,0.0660836,0.00533819,0.003331138,0.003605775,0.0006150816],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001067151,0.0001170512,0.04246494,0.001455772,0.00003492055,0.001022756,0.8264666,0.0002365567,0.004658323,0.02228036,0.001822764,0.09933328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000426376,0.0001810253,0.174431,0.00319549,0.0001322935,0.002233083,0.5875081,0.002120522,0.008704768,0.01124834,0.2100758,0.000126942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720702,0.003446378,0.005565302,0.0007762183,0.00008219397,0.0001973183,0.0008924092,0.00005083415,0.01691918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862415,0.002193965,0.008158624,0.00009528396,0.00005758589,0.0002275499,0.0008054946,0.00008766726,0.002132189],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05009073,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2171319655256738,"score_gpt":0.3922600616041437,"score_spread":0.1751280960784699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}