{"id":"W2950060417","doi":"10.1111/2041-210x.13243","title":"Validation of close‐kin mark–recapture (CKMR) methods for estimating population abundance","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Methods in Ecology and Evolution","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ocean Frontier Institute; Dalhousie University; Universities Space Research Association","keywords":"Mark and recapture; Population; Salvelinus; Biology; Electrofishing; Abundance (ecology); Population size; Ecology; Statistics; Fecundity; Range (aeronautics); Effective population size; Trout; Demography; Fishery; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Mathematics; Genetic variation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037869,0.00009584129,0.0002319307,0.00007330225,0.0001188697,0.000003696076,0.00007706005,0.0001644416,0.0001772062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005948123,0.00009616698,0.00003106043,0.0001590125,0.0001063631,0.0001891611,0.0001191659,0.000101973,0.000009920743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003577793,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009176794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003709382,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985773,0.0006324966,0.0002746616,0.0002813264,0.00004216829,0.0001920296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989577,0.0007157114,0.0001820576,0.0001188244,0.00001015003,0.0000155512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005031355,0.0000410379,0.9607663,0.00006324445,0.0000147762,1.030713e-7,0.0001872854,0.004797044,0.002504697,0.001763943,0.0003298696,0.02948136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003613474,0.0001032752,0.9008572,0.000009357,0.00002409049,0.000001212494,0.00007060221,0.04598128,0.0005269872,0.05164854,0.0003275054,0.00008858356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.5437168,0.00003676312,0.4534785,0.0002153682,0.0005640105,0.0004588167,0.000001336263,0.00001495191,0.001513464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3678894,0.000009519628,0.6317123,0.00007297762,0.00001302904,0.00005503603,0.000007774532,0.000004378347,0.0002355573],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1782338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3921576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01688634449267969,"score_gpt":0.3547564854742935,"score_spread":0.3378701409816138,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}