{"id":"W2950141386","doi":"10.26421/qic9.1-2-8","title":"Security proof of quantum key distribution with detection efficiency mismatch","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Quantum Information and Computation","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Quantum key distribution; Key (lock); Computer science; Detector; Set (abstract data type); Spectral efficiency; Quantum; Key generation; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Cryptography; Computer network; Computer security; Telecommunications; Channel (broadcasting)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003886716,0.0008959566,0.001162092,0.0009884236,0.001334977,0.002073389,0.001341726,0.002242232,0.005423647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01360766,0.000872139,0.001083616,0.0009813065,0.005243816,0.004856445,0.005821411,0.004055376,0.001002875],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00163298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001980393,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002483662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006893981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959603,0.0008488782,0.0002486484,0.0009167942,0.001476439,0.0005488683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911053,0.005658274,0.0008460201,0.001294931,0.000862455,0.0002329322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002247394,0.0000619423,0.0004549452,0.000216318,0.00004835784,0.0003403592,0.0001645515,0.008892792,0.01599897,0.9635074,0.001818597,0.008271116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003225222,0.0001536704,0.0004453231,0.00007952617,0.00005824398,0.0008860078,0.00005236845,0.0784548,0.04380202,0.8689593,0.006684502,0.0001017767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.09294292,0.001392673,0.8583643,0.005769614,0.0004833714,0.0002764193,0.000673325,0.0006415829,0.03945588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393641,0.0006519427,0.05589473,0.001021919,0.000213069,0.0002676887,0.0001689461,0.0000835835,0.00233389],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005423647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02055514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005558103140995537,"score_gpt":0.2169883230702582,"score_spread":0.2114302199292627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}