{"id":"W2950285971","doi":"10.1016/j.jedc.2008.09.004","title":"Valuation of mortality risk via the instantaneous Sharpe ratio: Applications to life annuities","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control","topic":"Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sharpe ratio; Valuation (finance); Martingale (probability theory); Life annuity; Actuarial science; Economics; Annuity; Econometrics; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Upper and lower bounds; Statistics; Financial economics; Portfolio; Finance; Pension","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007776014,0.001483462,0.001997087,0.002396024,0.0005319998,0.004222237,0.001998363,0.003143936,0.003486531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02963493,0.0007957742,0.001278176,0.00220173,0.003924678,0.0072301,0.002329562,0.004159437,0.0002340079],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001635883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008461044,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001389947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007803478,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986607,0.0008817065,0.00005290489,0.000127246,0.0001858547,0.00009170448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891037,0.008451071,0.0008463135,0.0004821183,0.0006766642,0.0004400703],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004807598,0.00005732756,0.001382348,0.00008735125,0.0000795365,0.000208373,0.0002181753,0.1248771,0.0007469205,0.8520061,0.001611403,0.01867732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002356476,0.0000303654,0.0006596686,0.00002736246,0.00002727284,0.0001147329,0.00007443473,0.3748572,0.0002019839,0.6227808,0.00116861,0.00003413907],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05736857,0.009637042,0.9185836,0.003366824,0.000245172,0.00004875448,0.00009839625,0.0001281742,0.01052346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8921629,0.01241873,0.08394019,0.0003581935,0.001501458,0.00009496108,0.0001144986,0.0001345668,0.009274354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007776014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04112393,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02340255748454505,"score_gpt":0.2935889158975662,"score_spread":0.2701863584130212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}