{"id":"W2950319501","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2019.9","title":"Methodological approaches to situational analysis in global mental health: a scoping review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto; Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Victoria General Hospital Foundation; University Health Network Foundation; H. Lundbeck A/S; Mitacs; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Allergan; Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Sunovion; Pfizer; Ontario Brain Institute; Servier; St. Jude Medical; Fondation Brain Canada; Ethel and James Flinn Foundation; AstraZeneca","keywords":"Mental health; Situation analysis; Situational ethics; Equity (law); Formative assessment; Business; Situation awareness; Psychology; Political science; Marketing; Psychiatry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1249146,0.00264232,0.00560504,0.04028786,0.003418996,0.01268108,0.004080308,0.004294155,0.005546928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2459711,0.002271807,0.006507308,0.04045863,0.006172618,0.01244202,0.008822823,0.004346893,0.001058033],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01492311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0443715,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01233845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02809195,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8983976,0.06591722,0.02081043,0.0032379,0.01062863,0.001008258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7347143,0.2231926,0.01395957,0.007331254,0.02003141,0.0007707942],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008247794,0.00007275044,0.001115052,0.5574536,0.002063353,0.0001921717,0.008658957,0.000732002,0.000244134,0.0394575,0.009295065,0.3806331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002781298,0.0000556627,0.0008213781,0.9162442,0.001775376,0.0001794553,0.00470297,0.0002278847,0.0001228461,0.01239925,0.06339915,0.00004407168],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005335506,0.9822375,0.00805082,0.003315508,0.0007551864,0.002380682,0.0002081093,0.00003006479,0.002488595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01050458,0.9531815,0.02462769,0.001679254,0.0002537348,0.008972446,0.0003041536,0.00002994342,0.000446759],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6606195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5806786701266896,"score_gpt":0.5561590961440698,"score_spread":0.02451957398261984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}