{"id":"W2950319501","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2019.9","title":"Methodological approaches to situational analysis in global mental health: a scoping review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Cambridge Prisms Global Mental Health","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto; Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Victoria General Hospital Foundation; University Health Network Foundation; H. Lundbeck A/S; Mitacs; National Natural Science Foundation of China; University of Cambridge; Allergan; Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Sunovion; Pfizer; Ontario Brain Institute; Servier; St. Jude Medical; Fondation Brain Canada; Ethel and James Flinn Foundation; AstraZeneca","keywords":"Mental health; Situation analysis; Situational ethics; Equity (law); Formative assessment; Business; Situation awareness; Psychology; Political science; Marketing; Psychiatry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004493634,0.001421181,0.007742749,0.0004669246,0.0005525741,0.00009523142,0.001129127,0.0005700415,0.0005521944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006871521,0.001227481,0.001518168,0.004834039,0.0001246584,0.0002003882,0.0006664495,0.0007240885,0.001631676],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01106375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018742,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002426622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007848463,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850632,0.005009845,0.003907771,0.002603024,0.001153398,0.002262753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949359,0.0003265307,0.002057139,0.00120247,0.00003869845,0.001439257],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110235,0.000871215,0.000672817,0.09562601,0.0007814573,0.00002150827,0.0001337076,0.000001203286,2.240674e-9,0.003223631,0.01876871,0.8797895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003760233,0.002572179,0.006305878,0.5009502,0.002486888,0.0005711395,0.0004381607,0.0000382255,7.310682e-8,0.00007426961,0.4799389,0.002863795],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005630165,0.961879,0.0005260106,0.006406313,0.002239021,0.02067838,0.004795502,0.000134755,0.003284784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004704209,0.9738703,0.004219521,0.01024599,0.0002288699,0.001679799,0.009167853,0.00006135278,0.0004792339],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8769257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998538,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5806786701266896,"score_gpt":0.5561590961440698,"score_spread":0.02451957398261984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}