{"id":"W2950438666","doi":"10.1038/s41467-017-01544-x","title":"Assessing species biomass contributions in microbial communities via metaproteomics","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Communications","topic":"Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":311,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada First Research Excellence Fund; University of Calgary","keywords":"Metaproteomics; Biomass (ecology); Microbial population biology; Amplicon sequencing; Community structure; Metagenomics; Biology; Microbial ecology; Abundance (ecology); 16S ribosomal RNA; Ecology; Computational biology; Gene; Bacteria; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006023083,0.0001517924,0.000241414,0.00006861029,0.003234457,0.0001943863,0.003639951,0.0004089104,0.000817414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002381587,0.0001573654,0.00007873017,0.0001346951,0.001761201,0.0006096243,0.002789033,0.001810642,0.000160533],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002106859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003039401,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1303505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985886,0.0006679092,0.0002608353,0.0001306192,0.00006868007,0.0002833406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957668,0.0004201222,0.0002321054,0.003494683,0.00003680587,0.00004954627],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005116281,0.001089685,0.2887439,0.00001416291,0.0001029601,0.000005306152,0.002612632,0.0000875824,0.6678774,0.02162227,0.01602153,0.001771399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006780126,0.0000309213,0.8629856,0.00002759239,0.00003460976,0.00001848834,0.0006095547,0.0006039684,0.005416228,0.004220305,0.1250186,0.0003561246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528355,0.0003300075,0.0002879107,0.01023818,0.0003294055,0.0003952474,0.0001005766,0.00005972236,0.03542345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949437,0.0001706896,0.003887498,0.0004814244,0.00002473719,0.00003134867,0.0002889818,0.00001133047,0.0001602934],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6624611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03657102392126872,"score_gpt":0.3285000209697769,"score_spread":0.2919289970485082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}