{"id":"W2950476897","doi":"10.1177/0956797619849928","title":"A Case of Evolutionary Mismatch? Why Facial Width-to-Height Ratio May Not Predict Behavioral Tendencies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Perception; Human physical appearance; Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00538153,0.0002745329,0.0004555838,0.0006383127,0.000522609,0.0008983826,0.000639235,0.0008403863,0.002922787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02292583,0.0001918671,0.0001686237,0.0004891814,0.002017117,0.001753113,0.0007969255,0.001068041,0.0002881572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002050094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000290209,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001615736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002189923,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978828,0.0009075207,0.0001146173,0.0007508473,0.0002106862,0.000133423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992723,0.003688066,0.001488547,0.001118554,0.0004857271,0.000496179],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002458899,0.00006041443,0.9767181,0.00003104848,0.000124516,0.000602799,0.001547557,0.0002409257,0.001948363,0.002108812,0.0004214845,0.01595007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001461776,0.0002410307,0.9809914,0.00004863888,0.00005362015,0.001947023,0.002865613,0.002361857,0.0006832491,0.009564976,0.001200456,0.0000275663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923277,0.0004334143,0.002343535,0.002319755,0.00006620408,0.00001179816,0.00008725664,0.00001235343,0.00239785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988158,0.00005487425,0.0005945523,0.0003435977,0.00003267028,0.000005081647,0.00002193573,0.000005591213,0.0001259595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00538153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02846056,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07449601462929815,"score_gpt":0.3914015612924282,"score_spread":0.31690554666313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}