{"id":"W2950495754","doi":"10.1186/s12864-018-5013-2","title":"Systematic evaluation of isoform function in literature reports of alternative splicing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Genomics","topic":"RNA Research and Splicing","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Biology; Alternative splicing; Ensembl; Genome; Gene; Gene isoform; Computational biology; Genetics; Function (biology); RNA splicing; Repertoire; Genomics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04068683,0.001197076,0.002180207,0.07123794,0.002459831,0.004311414,0.00237389,0.001555744,0.003526058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2030346,0.000554513,0.002194815,0.03534875,0.003447016,0.003720501,0.006036119,0.001157566,0.001159404],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001880213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004457575,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001626124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003356459,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9533327,0.009514398,0.01713745,0.007903898,0.01097497,0.001136545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6191957,0.2475208,0.06288515,0.02103311,0.04539744,0.003967722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001882371,0.0001557388,0.6783537,0.05847794,0.003975574,0.004547654,0.008744423,0.0013783,0.02911218,0.006507479,0.01452099,0.1923437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002016501,0.0006777321,0.7477352,0.02014791,0.009739162,0.01381624,0.010237,0.009217512,0.02841691,0.01873363,0.1405127,0.0005642395],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.7693252,0.1028171,0.03506767,0.002949397,0.001035537,0.002023154,0.07503346,0.002030449,0.009718254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8686724,0.01179194,0.05446197,0.0008763504,0.0005447733,0.002054595,0.05985133,0.0005562361,0.001190401],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07123794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2151751,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02361485555663592,"score_gpt":0.2997606159439789,"score_spread":0.276145760387343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}