{"id":"W2950660949","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2019.06.015","title":"Polycyclic aromatic compounds in urban air and associated inhalation cancer risks: A case study targeting distinct source sectors","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Pollution","topic":"Air Quality and Health Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks; Health Canada; University of Toronto; Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Clean Air Regulatory Agenda","keywords":"Environmental chemistry; Fluoranthene; Environmental science; Inhalation exposure; Particulates; Air pollution; Chemistry; Phenanthrene; Organic chemistry; Toxicity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005020385,0.0003964514,0.0002760568,0.0006573532,0.000721537,0.0008247045,0.0004365385,0.0009775967,0.001162433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006296572,0.0001991525,0.0006752083,0.0009718738,0.0004627535,0.0003129695,0.0006794983,0.0002951051,0.000154126],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008428857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006116877,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02833826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04835389,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996588,0.0001364684,0.00001188259,0.00005283115,0.00007632088,0.00006375121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995678,0.0002343644,0.00007240957,0.00003611483,0.00005710587,0.00003214995],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001534016,0.002829319,0.8921164,0.0002648764,0.0004318815,0.01975467,0.002760818,0.02586818,0.02076566,0.001242508,0.0006603562,0.03177132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001593219,0.003675958,0.8775623,0.00006711039,0.0007840652,0.01179273,0.01934616,0.05758364,0.02213255,0.001817789,0.004963223,0.0001151005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988397,0.00006972026,0.0002872267,0.00002403118,9.184276e-7,0.00001675646,0.0000765233,0.000003195411,0.0006818783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986998,0.0001920639,0.0004139546,0.00001034809,0.000002105587,0.000007804075,0.00005847538,0.000002646991,0.0006127949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02833826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0563466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02251785044230281,"score_gpt":0.2829790977351617,"score_spread":0.2604612472928589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}