{"id":"W2950868083","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1309.4153","title":"The coalescent point process of multi-type branching trees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Coalescent theory; Branching process; Branching (polymer chemistry); Most recent common ancestor; Markov chain; Point process; Population; Type (biology); Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Combinatorics; Evolutionary biology; Statistical physics; Biology; Statistics; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Physics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000234159,0.0002986389,0.0004427067,0.0000701538,0.0001644014,0.00005159569,0.0007992958,0.0002286669,0.00005130822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001098743,0.0002365853,0.0001458655,0.000226711,0.0001502697,0.00007134625,0.0005342974,0.0005119528,0.00002866903],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000894179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001412221,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005397639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001065274,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986072,0.0000704846,0.0003506011,0.0005090573,0.0001326527,0.0003300493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974692,0.0008257437,0.0004544634,0.0006518542,0.0004703142,0.0001283911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001441091,0.0004416731,0.00009571084,0.001371785,0.0002170031,0.0000431201,0.0006848634,0.006705261,0.0001481641,0.9885865,0.0003253431,0.001236418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004214611,0.00009144543,0.00005597662,0.0003505659,0.0001827097,0.00000265759,0.0006089061,0.277244,0.0003598901,0.7203659,0.00003531067,0.0002811431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2013856,0.0001492264,0.7966705,0.00005043662,0.0004842828,0.0006134742,0.00004482816,0.00009235277,0.0005093134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961441,0.0001538097,0.002868204,0.00001879894,0.00004440009,0.000002336813,0.000006382493,0.0000350872,0.000726882],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7947585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9647667,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1227200029609656,"score_gpt":0.2536215221956026,"score_spread":0.130901519234637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}