{"id":"W2950868083","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1309.4153","title":"The coalescent point process of multi-type branching trees","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Coalescent theory; Branching process; Branching (polymer chemistry); Most recent common ancestor; Markov chain; Point process; Population; Type (biology); Mathematics; Tree (set theory); Combinatorics; Evolutionary biology; Statistical physics; Biology; Statistics; Phylogenetic tree; Genetics; Physics; Paleontology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002402924,0.0005057727,0.0006937516,0.002230742,0.0008293956,0.002221907,0.001838908,0.001556131,0.004348129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008736076,0.0004101514,0.001234413,0.001242333,0.002530182,0.002992796,0.001555164,0.002371247,0.0007235118],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001368518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005754467,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001033485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005416754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990733,0.0002562456,0.00004049023,0.000234068,0.0002532098,0.0001427159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960658,0.001746086,0.0007315848,0.000374195,0.0006139948,0.0004684099],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002003425,0.00001154294,0.001109023,0.0000190877,0.00001071439,0.0001820692,0.0001622792,0.01939348,0.002005131,0.9727597,0.000290203,0.004036676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002692935,0.00003202191,0.0009379125,0.00002024767,0.00001502826,0.0003821493,0.00007465574,0.2787479,0.001171183,0.716193,0.002358547,0.00004033013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1397066,0.0003224711,0.8509496,0.0003679393,0.00007073765,0.00005977416,0.0001675796,0.0001440934,0.00821116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8802257,0.0004924002,0.107732,0.0001506297,0.0001711565,0.0001880843,0.0002955236,0.0001084463,0.01063616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004348129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01454592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1227200029609656,"score_gpt":0.2536215221956026,"score_spread":0.130901519234637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}