{"id":"W295089276","doi":"","title":"U.S.-Canada Lumber Trade Dispute - Analysis and Projection","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Competition Forum","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; Tariff; Government (linguistics); Subsidy; Dispute resolution; Business; Political science; Economics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00003584643,0.00006224576,0.00006512015,0.00004069341,0.0001080736,0.00002651561,0.00004792086,0.00001699858,0.002046073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001377844,0.00005996383,0.00003048851,0.0003495458,0.00005218144,0.0001143275,0.00004775086,0.00003154392,0.00008677131],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007620802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005914459,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4691541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7909813,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994819,0.00001339002,0.0000872236,0.000137122,0.0001363709,0.0001440534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998414,0.000006810964,0.00003182374,0.00008942457,0.000001069831,0.00002947861],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005068293,0.00003889676,0.7464296,0.000006502795,0.00003849162,0.000003597064,0.00001572776,0.0009810235,0.0001755208,0.01980072,0.2303465,0.002158328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009014148,0.000009410721,0.6176938,0.000001329833,0.00004848055,0.000001119456,0.000006264812,0.003636647,0.00005137451,0.000472578,0.3779107,0.00007814769],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.679467,0.00002229397,0.001413509,0.006751749,0.0001383183,0.0002380508,0.00002737725,0.00007017933,0.3118716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922376,0.000004540732,0.0001259188,0.0003629767,0.00003457693,0.000007215007,0.00006081236,0.000004118551,0.007162231],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3218272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988662,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0032792318497763,"score_gpt":0.184328191215328,"score_spread":0.1810489593655517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}