{"id":"W2950932728","doi":"10.1016/j.cca.2019.06.017","title":"Evaluating practice variance among family physicians to identify targets for laboratory utilization management","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinica Chimica Acta","topic":"Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control","field":"Medicine","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Utilization management; Ranking (information retrieval); Analysis of variance; Medicine; Clinical Practice; Coefficient of variation; Explained variation; Statistics; Internal medicine; Family medicine; Mathematics; Computer science; Health care","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009447792,0.0003535284,0.0005992576,0.001756807,0.000747402,0.0009900084,0.0005768745,0.0007304957,0.0008277801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0499582,0.0002512086,0.0007418861,0.001839212,0.0003031641,0.000717805,0.0006589816,0.0007281316,0.0001035919],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001619071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002344182,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01298236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01507996,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9901299,0.00522262,0.001099686,0.0009409923,0.002069982,0.0005368402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553988,0.02995776,0.007952943,0.001385298,0.003886206,0.001418881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001180737,0.0001268826,0.9936095,0.000008409407,0.0001214176,0.00001438943,0.0003326951,0.0001472894,0.0000870989,0.0000387057,0.00009225281,0.005303261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001825228,0.0004592483,0.9945132,0.00001471505,0.000079669,0.0000561399,0.0008045494,0.003586711,0.0001754634,0.0001230223,0.0001615868,0.000007544064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975215,0.0002057033,0.001353029,0.0001618454,0.00001035887,0.00005015307,0.0001269192,0.00001512979,0.0005553509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985538,0.00003520691,0.00114435,0.00003664568,0.000007526584,0.00003283485,0.0001042946,0.000003547639,0.000081751],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01298236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04996532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1324711589494406,"score_gpt":0.4896949906660784,"score_spread":0.3572238317166379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}